Intel Atom® Processor N270 - Intel® Product Specifications
Intel Atom® Processor N270 (512K Cache, 1.60 GHz, 533 MHz FSB) quick reference guide including specifications, features, pricing, compatibility, design documentation, ordering codes, spec codes and more.
Intel Atom N270 Specs | TechPowerUp CPU Database
The Intel Atom N270 was a mobile processor with 1 core, launched in June 2008. It is part of the Atom lineup, using the Diamondville architecture with BGA 437. Thanks to Intel Hyper-Threading the core-count is effectively doubled, to 2 threads.
Intel Atom® Processor N270
Intel Atom® Processor N270 (512K Cache, 1.60 GHz, 533 MHz FSB) quick reference with specifications, features, and technologies.
Intel Atom N270 Notebook Processor - NotebookCheck.net Tech
Benchmarks, information, and specifications for the Intel Atom N270 laptop processor (CPU).
Intel Atom - Wikipedia
Intel Atom is a line of IA-32 and x86-64 instruction set ultra-low-voltage processors by Intel Corporation designed to reduce electric consumption and power dissipation in comparison with ordinary processors of the Intel Core series.
Intel Atom N270 Benchmark - PassMark Software
Intel Atom N270 @ 1.60GHz Benchmarks for the Intel Atom N270 can be found below. Release dates, price and performance comparisons are also listed when available.
The Intel® Atom™ Processor N270 (code named Mobile Diamondville) is built on 45- nanometer process technology — the first generation of low-power IA-32 micro- architecture specially designed for Netbook’08 Platform.
Intel Atom® Processor N270
Intel Atom® Processor N270 (512K Cache, 1.60 GHz, 533 MHz FSB) - Download supporting resources inclusive drivers, software, bios, and firmware updates.
UserBenchmark: Intel Atom N270 vs Core i3-6100
Based on 113,468 user benchmarks for the Intel Atom N270 and the Core i3-6100, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,463 CPUs.
UserBenchmark: Intel Atom N270
Very poor average bench. The Intel Atom N270 averaged 79.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.